Talk:Jackpot Junction Casino Hotel

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Minnesota may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Notability

What more needs to be done to meet WP:CORP? It has multiple secondary sources and over 34,000 Google entries. Since casino articles are generally notable this should be sufficient. Vegaswikian 08:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ghits do not necessarily indicate notability, particularly where a subject is susceptible to being listed in directories, like one of the cites in the article. In a perfect world, I'd like the article to have something going for it other than "general notability", so that WP doesn't become an indiscriminate directory of casinos, but I'm ok with this one. --Butseriouslyfolks 18:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

There's no doubt that the two articles should be merged. They include much the same content. Commercial advertising should be eliminated in favor of basic information about facilities. BartBee 13:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to merge: no point in having both. Nyttend 15:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Somebody will have to explain how this rural Minnesota casino can be within the purview of a category about Nevada gambling. It's absurd on its face. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bartbee55057 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm doing the assessments and fixing the project tag with a past that includes multiple project tags. Looks like I missed deleting one in this case. The fix was to add the missing one for Minnesota which no one had added. Any one can add the state project boxes to articles clearly of interest to each state. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jackpot Junction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]