Jump to content

Talk:Jack Russell (priest)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

?????

[edit]

The guy who created jack russell's first name was john!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eseverance (talkcontribs) 23:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. "Jack" is the traditional diminutive for "John", just like "Hank" for "Henry". jdege (talk) 04:00, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jack Russell (priest). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Futile"

[edit]

"The noted Historian WG Hoskins described Russell as 'futile'" — What the heck that's supposed to mean? —Chowbok 05:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the same thing. What a weird sentence. 128.205.229.207 (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruskin: you added this sentence in September 2023, can you please add some context as to why Hoskins described Russell as futile. Nthep (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]