Jump to content

Talk:Ja Morant/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 20:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will take the time to review this entry. MWright96 (talk) 20:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Early life and high school

[edit]
  • "However, he gave up his basketball career" - how about ended instead?
  • Wikilink points, assists and rebounds to their respective articles for non-Basketball readers

Recruiting

[edit]
  • "While looking for a snack, Kane spotted Morant" - noticed
  • Who exactly is Tevin Brown?
  • Wikilink three-on-three game to 3X3 basketball and scholarship to Athletic scholarship
  • "On September 3, 2016, Morant committed to Murray State" - committed to playing for

College career

[edit]
  • "with 11 points, 10 rebounds, and 14 assists in an 80–52 win over Eastern Illinois." - victory to ensure that both win and the former word have an equal number of mentions
  • Wikilink steal to Steal (basketball)
  • and in late January 2019 at least one outlet projected him as the first overall selection." - how about forecast to avoid close reptition of the same word?

References

[edit]
  • References 23 and 26 are missing Associated Press as the news agency who provided the stories

Overall a neatly written article. Just some minor quibbles that need addressing. MWright96 (talk) 07:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]