Talk:Jürgen Kleditzsch/GA1

GA Review

Passed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Maxwhollymoralground (talk · contribs) 14:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 02:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this page, good luck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Discussion

The image in the article is allowed to be used from a copyright standard and it has a caption. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very stable, it has never had an edit be reverted on it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is pretty neutral, it's just stating facts, you haven't put any opinions in. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article covers his whole life so I can't think of much else that could be added. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig found absolutely nothing wrong. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is pretty focused. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I merged some paragraphs that were too short but other than that there aren't many prose issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any other issues with prose I fixed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The lede was a bit too short so I extended it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck

Time for a source spotcheck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will check sources 2, 4, 6, and 8. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean 7 not 8. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

7 needs to say he worked as a specialist physician in Neu-Ulm. It does here; "Heute ist er niedergelassener Facharzt für Orthopädie in Neu-Ulm." History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

6 should say he served as acting Minister for Labor and Social Affairs. It does here; "Und das Ost-CDU-Mitglied wurde 1990 Minister für Gesundheitswesen, dann Superminister für Arbeit und Soziales der letzten DDR-Regierung unter Lothar de Maizière (69, CDU)." History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

4 needs to say he; runs a private orthopedic practice in a Bad Wörishofen hotel, left the CDU in 2002, led various work and research groups, and that he was co-opted to the Bundestag following German reunification on 3 October 1990. It does so here; "Heute betreibt Jürgen Kleditzsch eine Privatpraxis für Orthopädie in Bad Wörishofen in Bayern.", here; "Im Jahr 2002 tritt er aus der CDU aus.", here; "Während dieser Zeit leitet Jürgen Kleditzsch verschiedene medizinische Forschungsgruppen.", and here; "Nach der deutschen Einheit gehört er dem 11. Deutschen Bundestag an." History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finally 2 needs to say; he joined the CDU in 1977, he was appointed Minister of Health, he was recognized as a specialist in orthopedics, and that he was elected to the Volkskammer in March 1990 for Bezirk Dresden. It does this here; "1977 CDU", here; "Apr. 1990-Okt. 1990 Minister für Gesundheitswesen", and here; "1974-1977 Facharztausbildung für Orthopädie". Alright good job, I can pass this. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.