Talk:Jörg Tauss
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sources not appropriate
[edit]Both the statement by Tauss and the law cited are primary sources and not appropriate unless referred to by a secondary source. The claims about the law are additionally original research, and not appropriate for that reason. Nevard (talk) 12:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Really, pls help me here: The inclusion criteria in Wikipedia is verifiability not truth, is researching the legal aspects not outside the scope of this article? Btw, the text and sources come from the German Wikipedia article, perhaps a rephrasing would be possible? Cheers. - 83.254.210.47 (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Not really, that would be original research- if a third party commentator like a newspaper legal reporter mentioned the connection it would be appropriate. Nevard (talk) 16:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- It was all over the news and shouldn't be too difficult to fix. - 83.254.210.47 (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. Do that then. Nevard (talk) 10:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- It was all over the news and shouldn't be too difficult to fix. - 83.254.210.47 (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Not really, that would be original research- if a third party commentator like a newspaper legal reporter mentioned the connection it would be appropriate. Nevard (talk) 16:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Article neutrality disputed
[edit]The allegations against Jörg Tauss of illegal possession of child pornographic material make 2/3 of the current article text. This puts undue weight on one viewpoint, leading to WP:NPOV problems. What makes things worse, the article has been translated for the Swedish Wikipedia in the meantime and sparked a similar discussion about "unbalanced representation" there. What do other editors think? - 83.254.210.47 (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, if anything, this is a case of recentism, not questionable neutrality. --bender235 (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles