This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
Hi @YodaYogaYogurt154, I've removed the three maintenance tags you placed for these reasons: 1. WP:DOB says A verified social media account of an article subject saying about themselves something along the lines of "today is my 50th birthday" may fall under self-published sources for purposes of reporting a full date of birth. It may be usable if there is no reason to doubt it; 2. getting flak seems an appropriate paraphrase of Variety'sAs her TikTok following grew even larger, the tide of public opinion began to shift. People on the internet unearthed old offensive tweets of hers, and before she knew it, Wolk found herself shunned—but feel free to offer alternative phrasing; and 3. WP:ABOUTSELF allows self-published sources for neither [an] unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim, which this appears to be. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see, the account Ivy Wolk has been using (@ wolktress) has been shut down. The citations that use tweets are likewise inaccessible now, and should be replaced.
Additionally, the "Public Image" section includes many (perhaps too many) quotes from journalists describing her twitter style, which skews positive. Wolk has been documented as tweeting racist, sexist, and other offensive sentiments; now that she has received a lot of media attention the twitter account is conveniently gone. I find it concerning that the article is portraying her in such a positive light. ChthonicSweetie (talk) 05:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Two references are to Twitter. There are archive links. We should follow the sources, and it's true that coverage of her is predominantly positive and sympathetic. If there are any newer sources which include different views, we can include those views. —Alalch E.19:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]