Talk:Iver Huitfeldt-class frigate

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / Nordic Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Proposed move

This is an interesting situation. The Danish Navy and most of the Danish sources use 'Iver Huitfeldt', though Ivar is seen in some sources. The namesake, Ivar Huitfeldt crops up as Iver in some cases, though Ivar actually appears to predominate. Given that the Danish Navy appears to have named this ship 'Iver Huitfeldt', it follows fairly uncontroversially that the article should reflect that. Benea (talk) 18:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missile Launchers designation and Missile Capability

In the First paragraph it refers to the MK56 12 cell ESSM Launchers. Later it refers to the Mk41 VLS system. Which missile launcher is actually present? I think the Mk41 VLS is present. I think the Mk56 is only designed capable with ESSM, and not capable of launching the Standard Missiles (SM). Also Mk41 is required for Tomahawk strike cruise missiles if later added.Plus the combat system is stated as the same as German and Dutch ships which have SMs, and Mk41 VLS. Adding Tomahawk missiles involves more than one would think. Spain obtained approval, and bought some components, then back out of completing the full system. Wfoj2 (talk) 18:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Ivar Huitfeldt class is fitted with both the Mk 41 and the Mk 56. Or rather, the Mk 56 can be fitted in one of the six Standard Flex slots. --Chrthiel (talk) 12:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The info block on the side is incorrect on the mk56. It should read 12 mk56 vls for 24 ESSM as per the article text - not 24 mk56 vls for 24 ESSM. 144.139.103.173 (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Iver Huitfeldt-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]