Talk:Iterator pattern

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

This is one of my first pages created on Wikipedia. Could someone help this page get exposure and turn it into a stub template?

Lababidi 05:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify the number of methods clause

Why 7 methods? sCan anyone explain this more clearly? --Quaestor23 17:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - why 7? Is it one for each concrete class to get the iterator, and then three for the iterator itself? mick wood May 3rd 2007

Attribute the definition

The first line has the clause: "access the elements of an aggregate object sequentially without exposing its underlying representation" which seems to have been extracted from the Gang-of-Four book (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Design_Patterns) according to the attribution here: http://home.earthlink.net/~huston2/dp/iterator.html If someone has the book could they verify? --arkul 04:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that this clause is exactly as it appears on Page 257 of my version of the Gang-of-Four book (Eleventh printing, May 1997) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheThiefOfTime (talk • contribs) 11:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Iterator appears to cover the same subject as this page, but in much more detail.

Reply: both entries seem desirable and apt. It seems desirable to link the two -- something this current query is achieving.

Iterator provides excellent implementation details for those aware of design patterns who are seeking information on this particular pattern.

The iterator design pattern entry is helpful for those seeking information on what design patterns are [or, as in my search, in seeking an explanation of iterator in a design pattern context].--150.135.48.70 18:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also came here while researching each of the GoF Design Patterns. 72.42.76.43 (talk) 20:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Examples not language specific

The examples on this page don't take the language specifics into account. For example the C++ example is a very long implementation by the book which is not typical for C++. The Iterator page offers far better coverage in how different languages implement the Iterator Patter (the concept stays the same).

It also would be nice to demonstrate some other common languages, i.e. Python. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.20.177 (talk) 19:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I trimmed the proliferation of language examples on this and other design-pattern pages as they were out of hand and generally didn't contribute to understanding the pattern. However, I think it would make sense to explicitly describe how the iterator pattern interacts with various languages. The semantics are basically the same in all languages, but both C++ and Python (and perhaps others?) have standardized syntax. We shouldn't let this get out of hand, but C++ and Python are both very popular and both use iterators extensively. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]