Talk:Italian seaplane carrier Europa

Italian seaplane carrier Europa has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 9, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / European / Italian / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

Image

Here - might be salvageable with some cleanup. Parsecboy (talk) 20:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian seaplane carrier Europa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 23:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

The article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general structure/layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article cites several reputable sources, and does not appear to contain any original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 23:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic for which reliable information was available. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's tone remains unbiased throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since its creation back in June, the article has not been subjected to any form of disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both images used in this article are relevant to the topic, and appropriately captioned. Both are public domain, and thereby do not risk copyright violation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 23:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Comments

"Description": "Steam was provided by coal-fired boilers trunked into two funnels located amidships, the number and type of which have not survived." Just to be clear, is this supposed to mean that records of the number and type have not survived? Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 23:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, none of the sources I've been able to find have recorded the details of the ship's boilers. Parsecboy (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Understood. Thanks! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]