Talk:Italian monitor Faà di Bruno

Italian monitor Faà di Bruno has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 12, 2019. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Italian monitor Faà di Bruno appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Italian monitor Faà di Bruno was powered by two engines from discarded torpedo boats?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/November.

Wikipedia

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian monitor Faà di Bruno/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GM 194 was captured by the Germans after the Italian Armistice Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
puppet Repubblica Sociale Italiana (Italian Social Republic) that they installed afterwards British afterwards.
She displaced 2,854 long tons (2,900 t), with a length between perpendiculars of 55.56 meters (182 ft 3 in) Tonne should be primary here.
- Many navies continued to use long tons after they went metric because that's how standard displacement was defined
She was fitted with four 40-caliber 76.2 mm (3 in) Ansaldo anti-aircraft guns Add an "AA" after "anti-aircraft".
water-cooled 40 mm (1.6 in) 40 mm (1.6 in) Vickers-Terni 1915/1917 light AA guns Two 40 mm (1.6 in)s?
- Ooops.
she bombarded Austro-Hungarian positions with little noticeable effect Link Austro-Hungarian.
What did she do between August 1917 and 13 November 1924?
- No idea.
What happened after she got decommissioned in November 1924?
- Kept in reserve, I guess.
Genoa is overlinked.
- the link in the lede is actually to the bombardment, not the city.

@Sturmvogel 66: No, It's still overlinked. Look at the sentences World War II and was towed to Genoa and where in the lead and in She was towed from Venice to Genoa, where she remained in the body. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GM 194 was scuttled in Savona at the end of the war and was subsequently scrapped Why did she scuttled? What happened?
No edit wars.

Infobox

The displacement isn't the same in both the infobox and the body.
The 381 mm gun isn't mentioned in the body.
British draught.
- Dammit

Sources

Google Books claim that Brescia's book year was 2013, not 2012. Which one is correct?
- 2012
Gardiner 1992's title should be "The Eclipse of the Big Gun: The Warship, 1906-45".
"Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-1922" --> "Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-1921" typo.
Ordovini and Trawick ISSNs are the same as the Clerici.
- ISSNs are for the magazine, not the issue
No OR.
The rest looks good to me and are reliable and academic.

Images

Looks good to me.

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, man.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to go. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 08:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]