Talk:Italian ironclad Roma/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- No DABs, external links OK
- File:Roma pirofregata corazzata.jpg needs a US tag and the Italian-specific tag for non-artistic photos would suffice for the country of origin, I think.
- Fixed
- watch the rounding on your metric conversions.
- Should all be fixed
- Add a link to ihp to the infobox. And delete the terminal 's' on engines.
- Done
- No need for short tons in the conversions. Just specify |LT in the template.
- Done
- Link full or deep load.
- Added
- I've always referred the Confederate ironclads as casemate designs, never the central-battery ships. Who uses this term? Certainly not Conways.
- Central-battery ships is a British term - casemate ship is generally used by Continental navies. Sondhaus, for one, uses the term and states that "...some navies—most notable the British—called them 'central battery ships'."
- Any reason why the cites for Sondhaus include years when the others don't?
- I think I had though I'd add something from the other Sondhaus book, but didn't actually find anything useful. Parsecboy (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
