Talk:Italian ironclad Italia

Italian ironclad Italia has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 19, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian ironclad Italia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ErrantX (talk · contribs) 11:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review this. Mostly looking good - I have made some copyedits. Also some brief comments:

Italia was under construction for nearly 10 years; I take it from hints in the article that this is unusually long, anything to add here to note that it was longer than expected
- How does the note I added work?
building ways; link to Slipway#Ship_construction?
- Sounds good to me.
Italia was not assigned to either the Active or Reserve Squadrons in 1898, though she took part in the annual fleet maneuvers that year.; so she was with the Reserve squadron till 1898 then de-activated? or something else? It just seemed a bit of a jump.
- It's probably safe to assume that, but it's often very difficult to track down the activities of these old ships. It's quite possible that the ship was deactivated before 1898 and it just wasn't recorded in one of these old journals.

Great article as usual --Errant ^(chat!) 11:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review! Parsecboy (talk) 13:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... It's so annoying when there gaping holes in the records! thanks for looking at those bits. --Errant ^(chat!) 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]