Talk:Italian cruiser Varese/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 16:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Pipe the link to deck (ship) in the infobox
- Watch ENGVAR - see armor and armour
- Good catches.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- What does Beehler say about the attack on Beirut? Might be worth checking Langensiepen & Guleryuz as well.
- L&G is what I followed for the article; I think that I'll rework this to put the whole incident into the footnote as Beehler also says that Garibaldi and Ferrucio bombarded Beirut.
- Whoops, that's what I get for trying to review an article at work. Looks fine to me now.
- L&G is what I followed for the article; I think that I'll rework this to put the whole incident into the footnote as Beehler also says that Garibaldi and Ferrucio bombarded Beirut.
- What does Beehler say about the attack on Beirut? Might be worth checking Langensiepen & Guleryuz as well.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)