Talk:Italian cruiser Liguria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Italian cruiser Liguria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Italian cruiser Liguria has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Italian cruiser Liguria is part of the Protected cruisers of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 8, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
February 13, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Liguria/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 19:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh God! Another ship article? I'll get right to it. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 19:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't look now, but just a bit more work is needed on these two before they're up as well. Parsecboy (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written

a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct

b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

The article is wonderfully written with no sentence or grammar errors.

Verifiable with no original research

a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

c. It contains no original research

The article uses book and journal sources all of which contain the necessary information.

Broad in its coverage

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic

b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

The article is broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.

Neutral

It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

The article is neutral with no personal statements or opinions.

Stable

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

The article is perfectly stable with no edit wars or content disputes.

Illustrated

a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article is illustrated with two images which are both public domains.

Pass, fail or hold?

With the article meeting the GA-criteria I'm going to pass it. Good job. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 20:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]