Talk:Isopogon latifolius
Appearance
A fact from Isopogon latifolius appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Manual data fix needed
[edit]@MargaretRDonald: the map is wrong. All occurrences outside Western Australia muct be cultivated plants. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Casliber: (Not necessarily - may be naturalised...) But I will fix. MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Removed until fixed. MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- It's not naturalised. it can barely stay alive in gardens on the east coast, let alone go weedy. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- A new map has replaced the old one, but everything may take a little time to sync. PS I have now checked the east coast occurrences which were all, as you said, cultivated. Curiously, the SA occurrence detailed the habitat (stringybark forest) in which it was found! MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- It's not naturalised. it can barely stay alive in gardens on the east coast, let alone go weedy. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Removed until fixed. MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class Western Australia articles
- Low-importance Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Western Australia articles
- Stub-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles