Talk:Isonomia

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge Isonomy

I put in a request for an article on isonomia because it seemed that a concept that pre-dated democracy really deserved its own article. Unaware of the article on Isonomy I came upon that article by chance and a request to merge it with democracy.

I couldn't find any discussion on the democracy talk pages so there appeared to be nothing to add. Obviously I think it is worth an article on its own. --Mike 13:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Isonomia --Mike 13:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==========

"Leave it" Why not just have a link for two pages. Each can be expanded upon. I don't think another page hinders Wikipedia's server storage space.

-- User:JivanMutkt 14:27, 09 December 2006 (FF)

The term I've seen being used is isonomia, so I'm not willing to see isonomia disappear, but I am willing to accept that isonomy may a related interpretation in it own right. I'm willing to be isonomic about this and have both entries! --Mike 17:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isonomy (horse)

Insonomy should not redirect to this page as there is an article Isonomy (horse). Disambiguation page will be better. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think a "for" hatnote would be more in line with WP:DAB. I think that the Greek term is the primary usage. It is more general and linked to by more general articles. The mainspace pages linking to Isonomy (horse), on the other hand, all appear to be other horses, while the article is about a single horse. I'll add the hatnote. RJC ^Talk_Contribs 17:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]