Talk:Isolatocereus
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is the split final?
[edit]@Cs california: On the split from Stenocereus, Yetman is very clear: "some cactus authorities (but by no means all)". If there is a newer and better source stating that the split had been settled, let's use it instead of Yetman. If we decide to keep Yetman, I think that we have to reflect his doubts in our text. Викидим (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Викидим: I believe so it was accepted by Kew a few months earlier. Last year it was still Stenocereus (You can see that I edited the Stenocereus list previously). Recently they took out Marshallocereus and Isolatocereus and placed them into their own genus. If you disagree or think it should be separate please add it back in. --Cs california (talk) 02:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- For the avoidance of doubt, I am OK either way. If there a consensus now, let's just replace Yetman with some other authority. Викидим (talk) 02:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you find anything please add it. I am trying to keep all the cactus consistent with Kew although there are some small issues with naming sometimes. But I added the edit back in just in case.--Cs california (talk) 02:16, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- For the avoidance of doubt, I am OK either way. If there a consensus now, let's just replace Yetman with some other authority. Викидим (talk) 02:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)