Talk:Island chain strategy
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Island Chain Strategy)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge of First island chain into Island Chain Strategy
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To not merge, given the independent notability of First island chain, and that is now has a distinct meaning separate from Island chain strategy. Klbrain (talk) 12:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Not enough content to justify separate articles. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose: The First Island Chain is of significant importance in strategic parlance, esp. with the increasing imp. of Indo-pacific, therefore, the article should not be merged and rather be expanded and improved. User4edits (talk) 15:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support: Ideally, all five island chains would have their own, well-rounded and fully detailed articles, and this strategy article would also be expanded and improved. But as it stands right now, the content of the two pages presents somewhat of a redundancy regarding the first chain, and the content of the two pages together doesn't warrant a fork (and that's current content, which would be reduced when all duplucate content is removed in a merge). If "User4edits" were to initiate some expansion and improvement to either article, I would possibly oppose, but as it stands right now, a merge is justified. - wolf 18:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support: There is not yet sufficient text to justify two separate articles. Maybe in the future, but not now. - Amigao (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. The concept may have come from the US "Island Chain Strategy", but is now a general strategic concept that is used by US, China as well as other countries of the region. It should stay as a separate topic. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose As per above. N. Mortimer (talk) 11:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Low-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles