Talk:Ishvarapranidhana

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ishvarapranidhana article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Yoga Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Will try to expand with better research-- the highest form of Yoga in many systems probably shouldn't be rated low importance! Given that this stub also is one of the most prominent returns on Google in its category, it would be good to put a little more work into it, which we'll try to do, but please don't beat on the newbie! ;=)

Phoenixthebird (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, that isn't what Pranidhana means.

current version says

"...Pranidhana, meaning attention to, love for, surrender to, faith in, or reunion with."

Prani means living thing/all living things/life in general & dhana means wealth/riches. ergo, Pranidhana literally means life-wealth. Lostubes (talk) 02:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also

ishvara doesn't just mean lord. ish just means 'god' 'lord' or whatever. vara is a sort of literal appraisal of benediction... it's a blessing... like "the great", for instance. Ish the Great... sort of. so as a whole, the word literally breaks down to Ish (lord/head) vara (the greatest) Parni (life) dhana (treasure/gift/riches/container... probably better represent in English as 'coffer' or a chest, perhaps) Lostubes (talk) 02:20, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

quite freaking important actually

considering the meaning of the concept, the literal breakdown of the word is illuminating to say the least. basically, it spells it out in black & white. Treasure life for it is the greatest god. or some condensed version of the basic gist. god-greatest-life-gift (the presupposition that "dhana" means wealth/riches actually stems from the root meaning of the word, which is closer to that of gift) Lostubes (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.articlesbase.com/yoga-articles/yoga-in-practice-ishvara-pranidhana-494226.html
Triggered by \barticles(?:base|vana)\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are the Yoga Sutras accepted Hindu Scripture? Should "In Hinduism" be revised?

The section entitled Ishvara in Hinduism continues to talk of Yoga Sūtras of Patañjali. I'm unclear that this is appropriate. The present Wiki article on Yoga Sūtras of Patañjali has this to say; "The text fell into obscurity for nearly 700 years from the 12th to 19th century, and made a comeback in late 19th century due to the efforts of Swami Vivekananda. It gained prominence again as a comeback classic in the 20th century. Before the 20th century, history indicates the Indian yoga scene was dominated by the Bhagavad Gita, Yoga Vasistha, texts attributed to Yajnavalkya and Hiranyagarbha, as well as literature on hatha yoga, tantric yoga and pashupata yoga rather than the Yoga Sūtras of Patañjali." This suggests that the work is not entirely reflective of Classical Hinduism or even Yoga philosophy for that matter! I'm going to remove the Ishvara in Hinduism title, although I welcome any discussion and will not object to its return with some (any?) justification. Certainly the Sutras may be an important part of Neo-Hinduism, but it doesn't seem to me to justify the title as a sub-heading when only the Sutras are referred to. Is Ishvarapranidhana even referenced in any other important Hindu scripture? It seems to me that this concept may be unique to the Yoga Sutras and therefore shouldn't be made to represent Hinduism generally. Tumacama (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]