This article is related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
I disagree with removing the stake president succession box mainly because at the time this office was the de facto leader in the area, which may be notable. HOWEVER, I don't believe Morley was ever officially a stake president, so if a box is kept it ought to be modified. I don't think it was a "stake" when he was the leader out there, it was some kind of mega branch. I think there may be three or four significant people that may warrant whatever succession box might come out of this. These were the de facto leaders (in succession) over the area through about the 1880s. I can't remember all their names, but it's at least got to be Morley, Welcome Chapman, and Canute Peterson. I'm pretty sure there's someone between Peterson and Chapman. Any thoughts? --TrustTruth17:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Sanpete County infobox better meets the need expressed above than the succession box did. Stake president is such a common position in the LDS faith that it really isn't notable in and of itself. What was really being expressed in the succession box was that these men where notable in their community, and the Sanpete County infobox handles that much better. -- 12.106.111.1001:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the wives of Isaac Morley, more detailed research (preferably with some solid evidence to back it up!) is required. As he was a pre-declaration LDS practitioner of polygyny, it should be pointed out that wives Abigail Leonora Snow and Hannah Blakesley Finch were taken by him sometime in 1844, probably on personal approval of Joseph Smith Jr. Hannah Knight Libby divorced her husband of 40 years to be sealed to Morley in the Nauvoo Temple on 22 Jan 1846 (Temple Book "A", cited IGI, also numerous published family histories, Pioneers and Prominent Men of Utah). Morley followed the law of adoption in having numerous other LDS members sealed to this Hannah and himself (following their second anointing also in the Nauvoo Temple; see references to children of MORLEY Isaac = Hanna on IGI). Harriet Lucinda Cox and Nancy Ann Bach Buchanan, another divorcee, were sealed to Morley on the same day (22 Jan 1846) as plural wives. Ann Dayer Spooner, another divorcee, was sealed to Morley on 11 Mar 1856, presumably at the Endowment House (Temple Book "A", cited IGI). No positive identification of Hannah Sibley has been made; best guess is that she was a childhood friend, dates 1796-1881, and with whom Morley never had a relationship in life; this could be a posthumous (necrogyny or necromony) sealing in the Manti Temple only provided by his descendants. Footnote for some of these associations may be found in Brown, Nauvoo Sealings Adoptions and Anointings, and someone with access to a copy should note page numbers. Genehisthome (talk) 07:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]