Jump to content

Talk:Is-a

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging Isa (computer science) to Is-a

[edit]

I think that Is-a is a better name than Isa for the title. AKA MBG 11:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with AKA MBG Korayvt (talk) 13:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll agree with this as well. If there are no problems or concerns, I'll probably merge the two sometime in the near future. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 13:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Same applies for Has-a and Hasa (computer science). --Chris Howard (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge  Done —Alex.Muller 18:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Java examples

[edit]

The Java examples are a bit odd in that rather than describing an everyday "is-a" (extends/implements) they focus on a complicated instance of the concept as applied with generics. Also, the text is not completely clear in that it may bring the unexperienced reader to believe that the Collections hierarchy has something special about it rather than just being a (sophisticated) example. In fact, someone completely unaware of Java reading the paragraph may be led to believe that Collections are Java's version of is-a. Moongateclimber (talk) 12:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Is-a. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Is-a. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article still need to be revised?

[edit]

@Mr. Guye: There are many cleanup tags on this article, but I don't understand their purpose here. Why does this article need to be revised? Jarble (talk) 20:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarble: I have removed the less serious tags, but the two I left definitely still apply.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  22:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr. Guye: Which concepts in this article are "too technical" for readers to understand? Jarble (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can remove it, I don't really remember, and it is certainly better than how it was.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  00:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really "PyType_Type"?

[edit]

Section Python: How does that lead to the name "PyType_Type"? Is that actually the case?

--Mortense (talk) 21:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Is-a&oldid=1201128957"