Talk:Irrational exuberance

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing needed

The paragraph on Fedspeak and Greenspeak, while well written, isn't exactly encyclopedic in tone, and veers dangerously close to opinion. We need to source it. I'll look at the sources from those two articles to see what we can use. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seeming Contraction

Another issue I see with the article is that one section says that Greenspan's comments had an impact in that three years later, the averages were way down, yet in another section it says that in spite of Greenspan's comments, three years later stock valuations were way up. The article can't be making both claims at the same time without explanation. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]