Talk:Irlen filters

This is a page that I created in order to improve the Dyslexia article. I removed a section here and made a short introduction for it. I know this page does not look very good, but if you are patient, I will make it better using IDA's information packet as a source. --Piechjo 15:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous results

Are the findings still ambiguous? I know someone who uses this technique and it helps some dyslexic children a lot and very quickly, but others are not helped. Perhaps the issue is that it is not always a solution, rather than it is not known whether it works at all. Stephen B Streater (talk) 23:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, now I've read one of the references, I think the tinted lenses were not specifically Irlen certified. I'll look further, as the sceptical paper quoted is twenty years old. Stephen B Streater (talk) 00:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are there more sources?

I see only two organizations cited now for any statements in the article. What well recognized secondary sources (published textbooks or practioners' handbooks on dyslexia) or what peer-reviewed professional journal articles are there on this subject? -- 17:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by WeijiBaikeBianji (talk • contribs)

PEER REVIEWED RESEARCH more than 10 0 of these studies supporting the use of color ed overlays and lenses to treat th e perceptual processing difficulties associated with Irlen Syndrome are published in peer - reviewed academic and scientific journals, including the Journal of Learning Disabilities, Australian Journal of Special Education, Perceptual and Motor Skills, Austr alian Journal of Learning Disabilities, Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, Journal of Research in Reading, Behavioral Optometry, and Ophthalmological and Behavioral Optics, among others. This research has established a hereditary component of the disorder (Loew & Watson, 2012

Robinson, Foreman, & Dear, 2000;

Robinson, Foreman, Dear & Sparkes , 2004 ), a number of biochemical markers for problems associated with Irlen Syndrome (Robinson, Roberts, McGregor, Dunstan, & Butt, 1999; Robinson, McG regor, Roberts, Dunstan & Butt, 2001; Sparkes, Robinson, Dunstan, & Roberts, 2003), and differences between both the anatomy and functioning of brains of individuals with Irlen Syndrome (Chouinard, Zhou, Hrybousky, Kim, & Commine, 201 2

Huang, Zong, Wilkin

s, Jenkins, Bozoki, & Cao, 2011; Lewine, Davis, Provencal, Edgar, & Orrison, 1997; Riddell, Wilkins, & Hainline, 2006; Yellen & Schweller, 2009). The research has repeatedly documented efficacy of both colored overlays and spectral filters, as measured by improvements in a variety of reading skills (Bouldoukian, Wilkins, & Evans, 2002; Nobel, Orton, Irlen & Robinson, 2004; Park, Kim, Cho, Joo, 2012; Robinson & Foreman, 1999; Tyrrell, Holland, Dennis, & Wilkins, 1995; Williams, LeCluyse, & Rock Faucheux, 199 2; Wilkins, Evans, Brown, Busby, Wingfield, Jeanes & Bald, 1994 ), reduction in physical symptoms that include headaches, migraines, eye strain , fatigue, and light sensitivity (Barbolini, Lazzerini, Pini, Steiner, Del Cecchio , Migaldi, & Cavallini, 2009; Bu lmer, 1994; Chronicle & Wilkins, 1991; Huang et al., 2011; Wilkins & Wilkinson, 1991), — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.20.100.230 (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== This part has no citation ==

"Irlen Syndrome affects approximately 50 percent of individuals with reading difficulties and dyslexia, 33 percent of those with attention difficulties such as ADHD, 33 percent with autism, up to 50 percent of those who have suffered a traumatic brain injury, whiplash or concussion, and approximately 12-14 percent of the general population. Standardised diagnostic procedures have been developed to individualise the colour selection. "

Elizabeth Liddle (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

discredited system

All the secondary sources say that these filters don't work (at least not the way it's claimed). The lead includes 7 cited sources supposedly backing up these claims, but none of those citations link to an online text that editors can verify. This looks fishy. Maybe information from Irlen syndrome could help. Leadwind (talk) 16:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irlen filters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808230629/http://www.ldrc.ca/contents/view_article/207/ to http://www.ldrc.ca/contents/view_article/207/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous or fallacious measures of medical efficacies, or other scientific claims

The histories of scientific disciplines and medical practices 172.56.120.80 (talk) 12:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]