Talk:Iran–Pakistan gas pipeline

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

I propose to rename this article to "Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline" just to follow same practice used by other articles about planned pipelines (e.g. Nabucco pipeline, Trans-Afghanistan Pipelien, Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline etc) and to make a link from a new page "Indo-Iran pipeline" like that pipeline has widely called.Beagel 19:17, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DETAILS ARE NOT SIFFICIENT

I THINK DETAILS IN THIS ARE ARTICLE ARE NOT SUFFICENT ENOUGH...... DETAILS OF COMPANIES INVOLVED AND POLITICAL FACTORS SHOULD BE THERE ALSO.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.135.40.76 (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2007

Ref

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/me_oil0218_03_18.asp

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/national/article257677.ece http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hamnjNu_4cDvLOdG8xPPco05wG7A

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704688604575125442598451212.html?mod=WSJ_Markets_section_Deals

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G12C20100317

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010%5C03%5C17%5Cstory_17-3-2010_pg5_8

http://www.cleanskies.com/articles/pakistan-iran-sign-pipeline-deal

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/Resource-Wars/2010/03/17/Peace-Pipeline-undercuts-Washington/UPI-15631268831670/

http://english.cri.cn/6966/2010/03/17/2001s557358.htm

http://www.hamsayeh.net/hamsayehnet_iran-international%20news1031.htm

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=120996&sectionid=351020103

http://www.cleanskies.com/articles/pakistan-iran-sign-pipeline-deal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mughalnz (talk • contribs) 00:45, 19 March 2010

Should be renamed Iran-Pakistan Pipeline

The current pipeline projects only entails the involvement of Iran and Pakistan. Possibly, China may join but this is not confirmed as of yet however india is officially out of the project after American pressure on that country and the subsequent signing of the nuclear deal. With this in mind, the article should be re-written and re-titled as merely the Iran-Pakistan pipeline as these are the two countries currently working on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.32.116.64 (talk) 06:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline → Iran–Pakistan gas pipeline – Since India is out of this project, the article should be renamed consequently. This has also previously been suggested in a section above. __meco (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Jafeluv (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Iran–Pakistan gas pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111120100109/http://www.mehrnews.com/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=1131606 to http://www.mehrnews.com/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=1131606

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iran–Pakistan gas pipeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100410041632/http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jan2007-weekly/busrev-15-01-2007/p8.htm to http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jan2007-weekly/busrev-15-01-2007/p8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]