Talk:Ionic compound/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting a Good Article review of this article

I'm starting a Good Article review of this article. North8000 (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I always like to ask this early, is there someone here who would be involved on behalf of the article? Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: yes, I'm around as nominator. Thanks for reviewing. --99of9 (talk) 22:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! North8000 (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria final checklist

Well-written

Passes this criteria. What an excellent job! Does far better at informing the reader than a typical Wikipedia article on a technical topic. The sentences are written so that they natively make clear informative statements, and without having to research the internal links. North8000 (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria North8000 (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 11:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria North8000 (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Passes this criteria. North8000 (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Has 9 images, all either are in public domain or have suitable licenses. North8000 (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Passes this criteria. Images are well-chosen to enhance the coverage of the topic. North8000 (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Couple of spelling tweaks? I think that the article is in US English but includes "polarised" and "neutralise". I would have changed but wasn't sure. North8000 (talk) 11:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, this article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article.

Congratulations, this article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article. Compared to an typical Wikipedia article on a technical topic, this is very well written and does a better job at explaining a technical topic. Excellent work! North8000 (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]