Talk:Ionian Revolt/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review of this version:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • Comment: Some of the references are styled pp [page numbers]" (internal space) while the majority are styled pp[page numbers] (no internal space). For consistency, they ought all to be the same style. — Bellhalla (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Excellent article. I only found the most minor of issues and have made those changes myself (primarily relating to colon and semicolon usage). Easily passes on first reading. — Bellhalla (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)