Talk:Interstate 680 (California)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Well-written.

• Lead section
  • Add "its southernmost point" between "...begins" and "at...".
• Route description section
  • In the last sentence of the least paragraph, spell out California General Assembly in the Assembly Concurrent Resolution 104, chapter 168.
  • For the last sentence of the second paragraph, be more specific in mentioning "takeover robbery"? Is that a carjacking?
  • In the final paragraph's fourth sentence, check spelling of Carquinez Strait. It may be misspelled.
• History section
  • Create articles or redirects if needed for US101E, Martinez-Benica Ferry, California Route 74, and urgency measure.
  • In the lead sentence of the fourth paragraph, put "(Federal Highway Administration after 1967)" after The Bureau of Public Roads.
• Future section
  • How long has the proposal to add a high-occupancy toll been under consideration? Please specify.

Factually accurate and verifiable.

• References missing on the first five paragraphs in the Route descrption section.
• No references listed in the Future section.
• For references listed, use WP:CITET to get formats standardized.
• Reference 10: Create article for California Highways and Public Works.
• Reference 15: Create article for urgency measure.
• Reference 16: Create and italicize San Mateo Times.
• References 20 and 22: Italicize Oakland Tribune.
• Reference 29: Shown as "Forbidden" when checked out. Find alternative reference.
• External link: The link has been moved. Please show.

Neutral.

• No issues.

Stable.

• Last edit was yesterday. Prior to that, it was on 5 May 2010.

Images.

• All images are valid.
• For images taken in the Route description section and the first one in the History section, list when the images were take in the caption.

Overall

• Hold. Needs works, but can be done for GA.

Reviewer: Chris (talk) 13:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I believe the red links do not need to be created for it to be GA. Also, for the stability section, what do you mean? --PCB 20:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

It was when the last set of edits took place. This was for point of reference on stability. Sorry about the misunderstanding. Chris (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Looks good so far. Do not forget to put dates the images were taken as mentioned in the images section review. Chris (talk) 15:04, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Passed GA. Chris (talk) 15:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)