Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 676

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleInterstate 676 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 2, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 676/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Highway articles are really pretty easy to do. Overall, all of the online sources look reliable and the offline sources are acceptable in good faith. The prose is mostly fine, but I had to make a couple copy-edits near the end to keep so many sentences from starting with "in." Everything that needs to be cited is properly cited; I didn't see anything that had me reaching for a {{fact}} tag. Appropriate pictures and a route map are included, and as a closet roadgeek I can safely say that this article covers all of the necessary aspects for a GA-worthy view of the freeway. This article brings me back to about 10 years ago, when I would spend forever looking at the 3di freeway listings on Kurumi.com, and I remember the little details like how I-76 in that area used to be I-80s. Good work.

Reviewer: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 15:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 676. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]