Talk:Interstate 405 (Oregon)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mccunicano (talk · contribs) 02:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking forward to reviewing this over the next few days. My great-uncle worked on the initial contruction of Portland's freeways, so this will be fun for me. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 02:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Route description

A reference for "the eight-lane Fremont Bridge, a steel tied-arch bridge that carries southbound traffic on its upper deck and northbound traffic below" would be useful.

Added.

History

Is the East-side Thruway the same thing as the East Bank (Eastbank) Freeway? I'm not really sure where the East-side Thruway is mentioned in any of the references I can access, though References 9 and 28 mention the East Bank Freeway.

Yes, they are the same general corridor. I've moved up the Moses document to make this clearer.

References

An error message comes up from the url provided for Reference 1.
- It's working for me (using Chrome on Windows 10).
  - It wasn't coming up because I'm not in the US. I looked it up using a VPN and it came up just fine.
Links to the first instances of sources from The Oregonian, Federal Highway Administration, Portland Tribune, and KGW should be provided.
- Done.

Overall the article looks great and does an excellent job neutrally covering the highway's development through the freeway revolts. Just a few tweaks should be all that's needed for this to pass. Cheers, ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 18:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccunicano: Thanks for the review. I've fixed the issues you've mentioned. Sounder Bruce 21:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making those changes. I looked over the Moses document and the Federal Highway Administration references and everything checks out. Adding all of the different names for I-5's predecessors might be a bit off topic since the topic is about I-405, so it's good the way it is here, though the Moses document notes it as the "East-Side Thruway" rather than the East-side Thruway. Either way the article meets the criteria for good articles, so this passes. Thanks for adding another quality article about the infrastructure of the Pacific Northwest! ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 01:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.