Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 180 (Nebraska)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I can take a look at this! — GhostRiver 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

[edit]
  • "and began construction" → "and construction began" - the subject of the sentence is "It", so current sentence setup makes it look like the highway constructed itself
    • Fixed.

Route description

[edit]
  • Good

History

[edit]
  • "local engineers union" → "local engineers' union"
    • Fixed.
  • The word "temporarily" is used three times in two sentences in the paragraph beginning "The southern section from 9th Street"
    • Fixed.
  • Missing letter: "1998. he project" → "1998. The project"
    • Fixed.
  • "nesting cliff swallow" → "nesting cliff swallows", as the source says multiple birds were found
    • Fixed.
  • It feels like there should be another sentence at the end to finish up this paragraph on the 2001-03 construction
    • Reordered to put the project elements last as a wrap-up, and expanded with another sentence on the bird issue.

Exit list

[edit]
  • Good

References

[edit]
  • Good

General comments

[edit]
  • Image is relevant and properly licensed
  • No stability concerns present in the revision history
  • No copyvio concerns

Just a few quick prose things, plus one area of expansion. Putting on hold for now; feel free to ping me with questions or comments. — GhostRiver 16:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: Thanks for the review. I believe I've addressed all of your concerns. SounderBruce 19:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 19:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]