Talk:Interspel
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tone
[edit]This article seems to be written in a way that does not describe the subject, but rather explains it from the subject's own point of view. Hence it is not encyclopaedic.
- Yes, it is very pro-Interspel. Are there not any criticisms of this approach which we could find? (I, for example, find the use of accent marks to be a clear disadvantage (too hard to type, nobody will be bothered, too non-English looking)). JIMp talk·cont 08:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
vizion??
[edit]What the hell is this vizion thing? As far as I can determine, it is not an alternate spelling of vision. Wschart (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)