Talk:Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Internet censorship and surveillance by country was copied or moved into Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "RWBEnemies2014":

From Censorship: "Internet Enemies", Enemies of the Internet 2014: Entities at the heart of censorship and surveillance, Reporters Without Borders (Paris), 11 March 2014. Retrieved 24 June 2014.
From Internet censorship in the United Kingdom: "Enemies of the Internet 2014: Entities at the heart of censorship and surveillance". Reporters Without Borders (Paris). 11 March 2014. Retrieved 24 June 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What constitutes "Little to none" in the map legend?

I would argue that many of these countries block thing such as Holocaust denial, Nazi saluting, drawing a large list of hate symbols (which do not necessarily facilitate violence towards whichever group it's targetting) etc. The sources do not explain what constitutes "Little to no censorship" as the map says. So, I propose changing basically all of European countries to pink, specifically the ones with laws against the things I said, and/or fixing the map legend. Test123Bug (talk) 01:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OUTDATED

This information could actually be considered as dangerous as it actually is currently spreading disinformation about censorship oulawed mostæyin 2018 Impregilo (talk) 02:29, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In 2024 this map is ancient history, censorship in the west is the same as China or Russia, the means are more dishonest but the effect is the same. 78.121.206.135 (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]