Talk:Internet Explorer version history

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Image copyright problem with File:Internet Explorer 1.0.png

The image File:Internet Explorer 1.0.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

File:Internet Explorer 8.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

16-bit IE?

"Original Microsoft Internet Explorer only ran on Windows using Intel 80386 (IA-32) processor". I put in Intel 80386. Didn't mean to say it didn't run on AMD or others only not sure that IA-32 is synonymous with 386 and not higher. However IA-32 means 32-bit (including backwards compatible 16-bit). Were there not 16-bit IE binaries not mentioned anywere in Wikipedia? This page should mention all such details? comp.arch (talk) 10:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tables are backward

Most tables on wikipedia are sorted chronologically ascending with the earliest first and the most recent at the end. I'm not sure if that's a guideline or a convention. The tables here are the reverse. I was wondering why. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

There is deliberately no guideline or convention. Wikipedia makes it a point to avoid worthless laws. Both forms are equally good. Basically, the usefulness of them to you depends whether you were looking for the most recent entry or for the earliest. But again, there is no guarantee that every reader has the exact same need or interest as you.

Best regards,

Codename Lisa (talk) 21:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There actually is a convention, confirm at the film and albums projects as well as most software products, but I get that you're saying WP:IGNORE.

Also, @Codename Lisa:, you're assuming it's my need to have it sorted in a particular order, which is not only incorrect, it's a personal comment and against WP:NPA on the borderline. Please comment on the content on the contributor.

In fact, I was simply wondering why the sort order was selected, but instead of telling me why, you told me, in essence if not in actual words, to f off and die. I get it. Thanks Lisa. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 20:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! So much negativity!

No. I did not intent to comment on your person and I am quite sure that I didn't. (I commented on the usefulness.) Everyone comes to Wikipedia to fulfill a need (for information) and there is no shame on having that need and wanting faster information.

And no. I am not saying WP:IGNORE. There is really no global convention and guideline. That' deliberate.

Best regards,

Codename Lisa (talk) 17:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Codename Lisa: I'm only interpreting what you wrote. If it comes off as negative, I apologize, it's what I'm seeing. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet Explorer versions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/january/new0122d.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Internet Explorer version history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet Explorer version history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050209093222/http://www.macuser.co.uk/macuser/reviews/16079/microsoft-internet-explorer-v40.html to http://www.macuser.co.uk/macuser/reviews/16079/microsoft-internet-explorer-v40.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IOS version history which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Internet Explorer 1.0 and 2.0 logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Internet Explorer 1 and 2 logo (1995-1996).png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]