Talk:International recognition of Transnistria

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2024. The result of the discussion was merge.

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Moldova

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles

NKR

NKR was split from the table of "UN non-member states" with the reason given "not recognised by anyone else", but NKR is not a UN member just like Abkhazia and South Ossetia; let's not create countless categories scattered along the entire page; there is no reason to further split "non-UN states" into "non-UN states recognized by states other than Transnistria" and "non-UN states not recognized by states other than Transnistria". Recognition of South Ossetia by Nicaragua does not give any more weight to South Ossetia recognition of Transnistria. Here the topic is Transnistria relations, not South Ossetia relations or Nagorno-Karabakh relations. These can be of similar background, but each of them operates independently of the others. Alinor (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A more important issue is if NKR-Transnistria really recognize each other. So far the sources we have are circumstantial - I would like to have some straight statements from NKR or Transnistria MFAs about their mutual recognition or relations. Alinor (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lihaas, please stop removing NKR from the list. If you want to discuss that, please do so here. Outback the koala (talk) 04:07, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing

The line "During a visit to Kiev by the Russian President Dmitri Medvedev, Ukraine signalled its support for "special status" of Transnistria and recognised the "important and stabilising" role of the Russian army. On April 15, 2014 however, Ukraine sealed all relations with Transnistria as a result of Crimean Independence." has a date in the future and the source listed is from 4 years ago. 66.46.112.60 (talk) 21:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"located between Moldova and Ukraine"?

It is the Russian occupation narrative, it is *not* located between Moldova and Ukraine, it is a Moldovan region. 46.119.131.104 (talk) 10:54, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International recognition of Transnistria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511144044/http://pridnestrovie.net/foreignpolicy_full.html to http://pridnestrovie.net/foreignpolicy_full.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]