Talk:International human rights instruments

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International human rights instruments article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: Law Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Mid-importance).

Nomination

I have nominated the 99 Percent Declaration by the Occupy movement. Dualus (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

God, you're exporting the POV-push campaign all over the place. Note that the sources seem to reject the idea that this document be associated with the "Occupy" movements. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 17:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly meets the definitions. Do you think [1] (audio) could be related? Dualus (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take a step back from your soapbox for just a moment and notice that every single other "Declaration" on that list issued from a major international organization such as the UN. The authors of the "99% Declaration" can't even get a bunch of hippies to vote on their "Declaration". Removed again. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 20:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the removal from factchecker, their is no common concensus among the occupy movement. Therefore human rights is not neccessarily a priority/platform for the group and should therefore not be included.Millertime246 (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As do I. Even if sources did say that the Occupy Movement is united around this, (which they don't) there is still no justification for the demands of a group of protesters somehow being put in this document. The idea is beyond absurd. Trusilver 21:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hell, no.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which is which

Dear Writers,

Classification point, Which conventions belong to UN general assembly and which conventions belong to international human rights law .

While in fact and at the end they are all laws belonging to human rights but as soon as this classification mentioned I would like to know .

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Atef Ezz (talk • contribs) 20:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Life orintation

Critically duscuss three human rights instruments

Life orintation

Critically duscuss three human rights instruments — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:32FF:10:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]