Talk:International Seabed Authority

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion of controversy

Besides dividing the article into sections, I added a section about the US non-ratification. This text could use specific citations describing eg. the ISA's official mandate to distribute mining profits to poor countries and to compensate countries for lost profits due to competition with seabed miners; and the specifics of the 1994 Agreement. This section is appropriate because the ISA seems to be one of the main sticking points preventing ratification by the world's foremost seafaring power, and this reluctance has directly affected the scope of the ISA's power. Should it cite back to the main LOS article's section about this dispute? -Kris Schnee 17:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Isalogo.gif

Image:Isalogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on International Seabed Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Seabed Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent related sources

Hylton, Wil S. (January–February 2020). "History's Largest Mining Operation Is About to Begin". The Atlantic.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)

—Paleo Neonate – 15:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fleming, Amy (26 February 2020). "One scientist's mission to save the 'super weird' snails under the sea". The Guardian. Environment.

—Paleo Neonate – 10:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded the lead and will return in the following days to further develop this article and the controversy surrounding ISA Secretary General Michael Lodge's support for robotic exploration of the ocean floor.Marcywinograd (talk) 14:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to abbreviate this section on the Endowment Fund, which reads like a PR piece; in fact, I think the whole section is unnecessary and could be removed. Thoughts?Marcywinograd (talk) 02:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leticia Carvalho elected but will not be in office before 2025

@Progoees, please note that Leticia Carvalho will only be in office for the next period 2025 - 2028. Until end of this year still Michael Lodge is in charge as secretary general. As I'm not a native English speaker I leave to you or someone else to correct the information in this article and also in the one for Michael Lodge. See this reference. Barbasca (talk) 19:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbasca Thank you for the information. I appreciate the correction. Progoees (talk) 06:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]