Talk:International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Climate change

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ciesin.org/TG/HDP/igbp.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100429214445/http://www.igbp.net/page.php?pid=230 to http://www.igbp.net/page.php?pid=230

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Global change is essentially a close paraphrase of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme's work, publications and agenda, using exact copies of their slides as illustrations. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme is a stub, so there's no reason why the 'global change' content needed to be split off to a separate article due to space issues. It's a single-POV article with little reference to any source besides the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, so it belongs under that topic. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it should be merged. It appears to basically be a summarized duplicate. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 02:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Global change article was probably established as a WP:COATRACK for International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, but nevertheless contains general points about the global change. So, rather than merging, I'd support trimming the current content to referenced claims (see What to do about coatracks); therefore, oppose merge. Klbrain (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]