Talk:International Free Press Society

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Query

the current (07 January) entry seems to be biased in both content and language and reads as though it were Danish Free Press Society propaganda. Nowhere is any mention made of the controversy that has erupted since the remarks Danish Free Press Society chairman Lars Hedegaard made in an interview on December 22nd 2009. If reports of these remarks are consistently deleted, then this entire entry is not objective, but merely a propaganda piece. Any deletions of coverage of the split within the Free Press Society over Hedegaard's remarks should be reported to wiki with the notification that the neutral point of view of this entry is entirely lacking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptomania (talk • contribs) 15:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is a good idea to mention the recent Danish media debates on this. The problem was that the IP-edits like these was editorializing and soapboxing. Your recent addition to the article seems more neutral. --Saddhiyama (talk) 16:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

libelous remarks

I remind all editors of WP policy regarding making potentially defamatory remarks against living persons. I have just removed remarks about an IFPS chairman which were supported by a non-existent source and further sources which actually threw doubt on the accusations made in the article. If such comments are restored the action will be reported to the appropriate administrators.μηδείς (talk) 04:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

His remarks were real and caused quite a stir at the time. Several prominent members of the society chose to leave it following it. Also I can't see where "politiken.dk source says the left is spreading lies about what was said", you will have to elaborate what you meant by that. Because as far as I can see, all the links, which are all RS, quite accurately supports the claims in the article. --Saddhiyama (talk) 08:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly isn't libellous on our part as the material traces back to the Copenhagen Post. That said, we do need to be very careful that the quotes attributed to him are direct and accurate translations rather than somebody else's paraphrasing or characterisation of his comments. Apart from that, I can't see any serious problem with this coverage apart from the meaningless use of the word "categorically" which I have removed. --DanielRigal (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

BAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

One of its board members wants to ban the Koran, and we call it a free speech organisation? We don't say anything about its politics? Take a look at this [1] - and this interesting quote: "absolute freedom can lead to absolutism. Hitler used freedom of speech and the democratic process to enddemocracy. The fascist parties of Europe today have thesame strategy.’ See this on Geerts [2]. No surprise that Lawrence Swain calls the group "authentically neo-Fascist."[3] Dougweller (talk) 09:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a proper overview section of the organisation telling about its politics. Not sure what the Nazi references have to do in regards to developing this article. Then again, the Danish Prime Minister affirmed support free speech after the gunman attack, but not sure if this article should focus on Hedegaard only (and I mean both: hate speech trial and gunman attack). --Pudeo ' 18:30, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The lead should be a summary of the article. It isn't. And why are we listing all those aims? We should be talking about what it does, not what it says it does, and how others describe it - if a reliable source calls it neo-Fascist, then that should probably be in the article. Don't try to use Godwin's law, that's just a way to stifle discussion in this context. Dougweller (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Swain by no means is an authority on this in his book The Death of Judeo-Christianity. His think tank Interfaith Freedom Foundation seems to be even less notable than this "International Free Press Society". But correct me if I'm wrong, if it's notable certainly his opinion on this can be told, but I don't think his book was even really about this topic. Hedegaard was featured in many newspieces now: apparently most described him as an "critic of Islam". For example, the BBC tells that this organisation was founded for "supporting Geert Wilders' right to criticize Islam" but notes that Hedegaard has made "degrading comments about Muslims." --Pudeo ' 22:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Free Press Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on International Free Press Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]