Talk:Internal Fire Museum of Power

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Title of the article

I see nothing wrong in dropping the word "Museum" from the title, if this does not create an ambiguity and goes accordingly to organisation's self-identification. There is British Engineerium, for example. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please make your mind up as to whether you object to the use of "museum" in this article (which you removed) or to the punctuation of the article title (which you claimed in your edit summary). As explained before, the title comes from the original redlink at requested articles. I've no strong feelings about the punctuation one way or the other. However "Internal Fire" as a bare name is unclear to our readers and your assertion that "Internal Fire - Museum of Power" isn't supported by the museum's own website and materials is simply false, as a moment's inspection will show.

Also, why are you dragging a content dispute from nutation into other articles? Or is this simply a tactic to troll any other editors who disagree with you there and to waste as much of their time as you can? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:12, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the title initially came from a red link (and hence is not your personal choise), but you reverted the move. Please, point why exactly "my assertion is simply false"? Where at internalfire.com do you see this internal-space-fire-space-stroke-space-museum-space-of-space-power? Up to letter case, of course, but as a name of the organisation and with a stroke. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Top left corner of their own website uses "Internal Fire Museum of Power". The website you claimed to be quoting when you removed "Museum of Power". I don't care about any reasonable choice of typography here, but you're doing one thing, citing supporting evidence that bears no relation to it, and using edit summaries about something else altogether. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internal Fire – Museum of Power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090118165708/http://www.internalfire.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=136 to http://www.internalfire.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=136

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]