Talk:Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing
[edit]You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- It would be great to hear suggestions of new sources on this topic, for editing this and other articles on Wikipedia. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 02:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This article needs a lot of work.
[edit]Thus far this article doesn't even agree on simple issues like verb tense to relate the conclusions of the report. It's probably time to pass through for a rewrite from top to bottom, updating the sources with newer publications that have more analysis of the report's statements. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 13:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Strange edit summaries
[edit]I ask Generalrelative and NightHeron to please explain, why a different article's talk page establishes anything of great consequence for this one. Lamptonian (talk) 10:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Because RFCs, especially ones like these that had broad participation and clearcut resolution, establish consensus of Wikipedia editors about specific interpretations of Wikipedia policy, in this case, that the policy regarding the treatment of WP:FRINGE points of view should apply to racial hereditarianism. NightHeron (talk) 11:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)