Talk:Integral probability metric

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 October 2023 by reviewer RetroCraft314 (talk · contribs).

Artificial Intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles

Statistics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Notice of self-citation

I wrote this draft, and am identifying myself as Danica J. Sutherland; I'm a co-author on three of the 23 cited references. I think all of them are very relevant to the topic.

In particular, one of them is WP:SELFPUB – this stats.stackexchange answer [1], which I wrote because I couldn't find a convenient, standalone proof for this piece of folklore (though I can point to many published papers which state it without proof). I believe this answers meets the standards set in "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications.": I have several peer-reviewed publications in top venues on closely related topics (see e.g. the other two citations as well as [2] and [3] for the most-related papers), and am also a tenure-track assistant professor (with a PhD) at the University of British Columbia teaching relevant graduate courses [4] [5]. Epistemenical (talk) 06:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]