Talk:Insurgency in Laos

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Laos.

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Untitled

Why are they revolting? well this is crap.

They're revolting because they're being brutalized and slaughtered. On a related note, would anyone object if I added this to Category:Genocide? Josh (talk) 03:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

Why not simply "Persecution of Hmong?" We have "Persecution of Falun Gong," so why the wordy title on this one? 22:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Need to develop accuracy

As the primary writer on the Laotian Civil War, I have to point out some serious inaccuracies in this article. To do so, I am going to quote the section that needs work, along with the facts I have researched.

"Hmong forces attacked North Vietnamese supply lines on the Ho Chi Minh Trail,"

Actually, most fighting between Hmong and PAVN took place on the Plaine des Jarres, far from the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

"rescued downed American pilots,"

True.

"were utilized by the CIA as drug traffickers,"

Untrue, no matter which view you take of the complex situation of the CIA, the Hmong, and their sole cash crop, of opium.

"and waged battles against the communist/nationalist Pathet Lao."

Upon occasion. Although the Pathet Lao were communists, and there were many non-Pathet Lao nationalists, including the Neutralists.

"They also backed up the Lao Royal Army to combat the Pathet Lao and North Vietnamese Army."

To be more accurate, the Hmong fought for Laos while the RLG troops usually spectated. In ground combat, the Hmong and the NVA regulars were the principal opponents.

I might end by also noting the need for renaming this article. The Hmong conflict in Laos dates back to the late 1940s, so limiting the conflict to 1975 to present is misleading. Unless, of course, this article is extended backwards in time to approximately 1945.

Georgejdorner (talk) 06:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to outright question the objectivity of this page. It is very much so pro hmong with little objectivity.Slipoutside (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Democratic Kampuchea COA.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Democratic Kampuchea COA.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:20, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Suab Hmong News: Hmong, Lao, Vietnamese, and Cambodia rally against Vietnam officials visit USA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsVFonG0hP0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOGoSjksjxc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZyX1xYmLcs

http://www.shrdo.com/index.php/suabhmong-news/hmong-news/1869-hmong-lao-vietnamese-and-cambodia-group-in-minnesota-rallied-calling-for-human-rights-in-vietnam-and-laos

Vietnam's secret crime against Hmong

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5k0xeIjICQ

Vietnam: Hmong Christians Remain Bold Witnesses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQVeaFVOUbY

http://www.unpo.org/article/196

Rajmaan (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Insurgency in Laos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Insurgency in Laos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA260032007
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071217115735/http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/225993.html to http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/225993.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Hmong genocide" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hmong genocide. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 13#Hmong genocide until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t · c) buidhe 20:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More citations needed

Several paragraphs are unsourced or sourced by only one citation, often unreliable blogs. This article needs more citations for verification. CentreLeftRight ✉ 22:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2008 end date?

Why does it state that the insurgency ended in 2008 when sporadic attacks still happen? Aren't these related? Wowzers122 (talk) 02:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC) https://www.rfa.org/english/news/laos/clash-03182021163834.html https://www.rfa.org/english/news/laos/assault-04012021160502.html https://unpo.org/article/19682[reply]

It seems to me that somebody arbitrarily chose 2008 as the ending year. The original source given was a student's presentation and it did not even claim that the insurgency ended in 2008. The editor Baba Mica attempted to remedy the sourcing issue, but the source they provided does not say anything regarding the end of the conflict. The date Baba Mica gave, 10 July 2008, is only mentioned in one sentence that says nothing about the conflict's duration ("On July 10, the Thai authorities repatriated approximately 400 Hmong to Laos."), so I do not know what's going on here. Yue🌙 05:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ended in 2020?

These two edits have changed the ending date from "present" to "circa. 2020". But the newly added source doesn't have any mention of the conflict.

The source deleted by these edits , on the other hand, clearly indicates there was a clash in 2021.

A comment in these edits reasoned the change as "There wasn't a single major attack in 2022 (ACLED recorded not a single death related to the insurgency in 2022), so it is ended". The added source does not directly say there was no major attack in 2022. Therefore, this must be WP:OR at the very least. Furthermore, even if in fact there had been no attack in 2022, that wouldn't directly mean the conflict would have been ended. Niboshi000 (talk) 18:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted those edits. Niboshi000 (talk) 16:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]