Talk:Institute of the Czech Language

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Czech Republic High‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Czech laws are "personal comments"?

I want to signalize mistakes in this article. Czech language institute is not regulatory body. Czech language institute doesn't regulate Czech language but only watches development of Czech language a describe it.

I am consterned that official Czech laws, which desribes role of Czech language institute, is considered as "personal comment".

I am consterned twice if I can read that official act of Czech minister is also considered as "personal comment".

Thank you for clarifying me "seriousness" of wikipedia. Congratulation for you, I am abandoning wikipedia as source of big lies.

deleted comments on article

"Note from Czech people: Czech language institute is not regulatory body of the Czech language. The one has no rights to control or regulate Czech language. This Institute caused several hard lapses in past. For example: In 1993 Czech Minister for education Ivan Pilip has officially cancelled and fixed the rules of Czech language from Czech language Institute. Many Czech people protested against the work of Czech Language Institute. Czech language institute has only passive role. The one only passive collects and researches the spontaneous evolution of Czech language. Czech language institute can determine rules for Czech language only for schools, not for official Czech language. Czech language institute changes rules for Czech language very very often, many times per century. Every Czech people meets several significant changes of Czech language – that's why (together with lapses) this instutute haven't authority to regulate Czech language."

these are not adequate for Wikipedia. 1) they are very poorly written; 2) they are personal comments. any factual content needs to be reviewed, rewriteen and properly referenced. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rewritten

Although my short new text is only about 80%-sourced, it is factually correct and should not spark any controversy. If I come across relevant references, I will add them. On the legal status, there seem to be no texts online, and also, note how the Institute itself avoids the issue on its website. Littledogboy (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the rewrite, I'm just not sure what is meant by "scientific and popularization publishing" in the first sentence and have tagged it as such. - filelake shoe  20:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for the proofread, I should take better care. Explained what you requested. Littledogboy (talk) 18:52, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Institute of the Czech Language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130420204330/http://avcr.cz/o_avcr/struktura/pracoviste/humanitni/UJC.html to http://www.avcr.cz/o_avcr/struktura/pracoviste/humanitni/UJC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]