Talk:Instant rice

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

FNHgroup12 (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

There are general citations for quality and sources which seem to be extremely unhelpful. Suggest marking unsourced claims with ^{[citation needed]} to help improve the article. Antivert (talk)

The claim that nutrition is diminished by rapid cooking seems unsupported by any evidence whatsoever. It requires a citation of some sort (re: "not only is the nutritional value compromised") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.104.57.156 (talk) 21:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does this precooked rice taste like?.. i need an answer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.58.251.19 (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): FNHgroup12, Charlielau96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vitimins

This article said, "They also try to make up for the loss of nutrients by adding their own nutrients such as B-vitamins, thiamin, folic acid, and niacin", but thiamin, folic acid, and niacin are B-vitamins. The way the sentence was written makes it sound as though they are not. I removed them.

Nick Beeson (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable disadvantages

Disadvantages

Instant rice has fewer of the calories, carbohydrates, and protein than regular rice.

Two out of three of these are a good thing to reduce, thus not a disadvantage. 124.188.145.99 (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this page altogether (particularly this section) should be rewritten as it seems like it has been quite some time since the article was last edited. This could suggest some reasons why some disadvantages still remain on the page. If some of these disadvantages are still present nowadays, we might need some sources to back these up since there's a huge lack of sources in this section (and the page overall). --Jeer1002 (talk) 01:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Preparation process

^[1]

Making the rice ^[2] Drying of the rice ^[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by FNHgroup12 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FNHgroup12 (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Sabrina[reply]

References

Physical properties

During original cooking of rice During the dehydration process During the rehydration process ^[1] FNHgroup12 (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Sabrina[reply]

References

^ http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijfs.13011/abstract

Quality

Additives ^[1]

Novel combined drying^[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by FNHgroup12 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FNHgroup12 (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Sabrina Texture and starch digestibility ^[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by FNHgroup12 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Packaging

microwave use ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by FNHgroup12 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC) FNHgroup12 (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Sabrina[reply]

References

^ https://www.google.com/patents/US4803088

microwave ready, not dehydrated

Caption on images reads 'Instant brown rice (microwave ready, not dehydrated) sold in Korea'.

Not dehydrated? Its either nonsense and needs deletion, or needs explanation.

You're absolutely right, this is not "instant rice" in the sense intended. Any food can be cooked and packaged to later be heated up in a microwave and *might* be called "instant xxxxx" but don't get their own wikipedia page! I changed the lede to differentiate the invention of instant rice and such a product, and indeed the two photos do not belong on this page (especially since there isn't any photo of actual instant rice, which wouldn't look any different from other rice except the package!) so I'm removing those Interferometrist (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/science/article/pii/S0022474X15000053

[2] ttp://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/science/article/pii/S073352101500079X

[3] ttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2011.00651.x/abstract

[4] ttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijfs.13011/abstract

[5] ttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671062/?tool=pmcentrez

[6] ttp://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/doi/pdf/10.1080/07373937.2014.900503

[7] ttp://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/science/article/pii/S0260877410005200

[8] ttps://www.google.com/patents/US4803088

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]