Talk:Inside No. 9/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 16:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this...

"As is typical of Shearsmith and Pemberton's work" their names should in full and wikilinked here
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"The pair returned to writing macabre stories, according to Shearsmith, as they", think this could be rephrased
- Rephrased. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Digital Spy published the overnight rating for Episode 3 as 1.00m; same figure given by a forum member on the ratings thread.
- I'd rather avoid Digital Spy, but it seems better than no source at all. Good find. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Quiet Night In" was a change in approach, relying on physical comedy,[63] but it was well-received as funny" well received shouldn’t be hyphenated here because it follows a noun.
- I'll take your word for it! J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"lower than the slot average of 970,000 (5.1% of the audience)...............The series low was the fifth episode, "The Understudy", which attracted 720,000 viewers (4.1% of the market), is there a difference, or do they both mean audience share?
- Linked audience share and changed for consistency. I was just trying to avoid repetition, but clarity is more important! J Milburn (talk)
"Inside No. 9 was also nominated for Best TV Sitcom at the 2014 Freesat Awards,[91] which celebrate the best of free British television”, Free-to-air for clarification
- Good idea. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 50 was published in The Guardian, not theguardian.com
- Fixed, thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very comprehensive and enjoyed reading this. No dead links or dabs and could find no close-paraphrasing issues. Pictures are fine. Will pass once comments have been addressed. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and kind words. I have made the changes you suggested. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everything's in order; shall pass. Lemonade51 (talk) 19:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot- this completes my topic! J Milburn (talk) 21:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]