Jump to content

Talk:Inosculation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fused, or forked?

[edit]

Is there a difference in terminology between two stems that fuse (inosculation) and one that forks? What happens internally in the specimen above the inosculation point? Are there always two piths? I've never heard of two piths fusing into one, but I've definitely seen many cases where one pith splits into two (at a fork point). Three of the photos on the page look to me like normal cross-sections a few inches above a fork point: Fused chestnut trees; Fused ash trees; and Fused ash trees, side view. The question for the side-view photo is, where the cut face is shown, was this at the bottom of the section, or was it at the top? If the cut face was from the top of the stem while it was still standing, it's obvious that this was a single stem lower down that split or forked into two. Is that the same thing as "inosculation"? This needs to be cleared up and some authoritative references are needed. pradtke (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Added Japanese maple to the list

[edit]

I added Japanese maple to the list, after alphabetizing. No documentation is on hand for Japanese maple. But after 3000 pruning projects, its evident that Japanese maple is the most common tree I find out of all encountered to bond like this, branch to branch. That and willow, which is already on the list.Mdvaden 03:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed crepe maple to "crape myrtle" which is the correct genus and species spelling.Mdvaden 03:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All material from Husband and Wife tree is represented here, I believe. What would be the objection to making that article simply redirect here?--Wetman (talk) 05:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No objection, good move.Slowart (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone has already merged the pages, I'll tidy up and redirect. Blackash have a chat 01:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inosculation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]