Jump to content

Talk:Innocent Eyes (2006 Delta Goodrem album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Japan album cover.jpg

[edit]

Image:Japan album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(cur | prev) 08:17, 22 January 2014‎ User:BennySOTOTW:) you removed page Innocent Eyes (Delta Goodrem compilation album) back to Innocent Eyes (2006 album) but there is also Innocent Eyes (Graham Nash album), so the Delta Goodrem album should have "Delta Goodrem" on it. The fact that the Nash album is 1986 is irrelevant, we don't disambiguate by year. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved to Innocent Eyes (Delta Goodrem Sony Music Japan album) but Innocent Eyes (2006 Delta Goodrem album) might be better if the other was also to have the year added. The main problem here may be that this should be merged anyway. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]