Talk:Infiltration (hydrology)

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soil High‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Infiltration (hydrology) is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I think Infiltration should remain as a separate entry. It is an important concept in the planning and design of Sustainable urban drainage systems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willow4 (talk • contribs) 26 May 2006

Infiltration is certainly not the same as permeability. That is complete rubbish, and I'll remove that suggestion immediately. Mwtoews 16:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 9 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: BN1998, Westbrookholly.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to chemical content

shouldnt we have some text in this article regarding the role of chemical contents of infiltrating water, eg processes of adsorption of some chemical species on soil particles and the inverse of dissolving some chemicals which are already absorbed or adsorbed in the soil? Anlace 22:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kostiakov

Another infiltration equation is the Kostiakov equation. I don't have the details handy, but believe it has a similar approach as Horton

Rwos 16:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infiltration Calculation Methods

I do not think that the "Infiltration calculation methods" introductory paragraph is correct. With the exception of the first subheading the remaining subheadings are not "estimation methods" but instead are expressions to represent the process of infiltration.

Estimation methods would include procedures to calibrate one of the infiltration equations against field measurements such as matching the Horton equation to infiltrometer measurements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GILDog (talk • contribs) 06:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Infiltration (hydrology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608071757/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461 to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All good 129.0.77.212 (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]