This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Text and/or other creative content from Aesthetics was copied or moved into Indian aesthetics with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article (Indian aesthetics) is misnamed, as it is entirely about the theory and history of Rasas, rather than any other aspects or elements of Indian aesthetics. The entirety of Indian art, music, literature, drama and so forth is massive, and this article doesn't even attempt to discuss that massive field of aesthetic theory. Perhaps rasas are an important element of Indian aesthetics, but they are not the entirety by any means. This article should be merged into Rasa (aesthetics).Fuzzypeg★07:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. The article was created by copy-pasting and leaving a redirect for the old rasa article. What is left now is WP:CFORK, or inadvertent "India = Hindu" POV. Unless cogent reasons are forthcoming, we should remove content forking, leave a summary-style section here on rasa, and add sections on aesthetics in non-Hindu Indian texts. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
