Jump to content

Talk:Indian Railways/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 04:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The lead should not have citations unless the information is unique. The lead is supposed to be a summary of the whole article.
    • The article is poorly formatted, for example the Railway links to adjacent countries section should be prose rather than a bulleted list.
    • The tables used in the article are inconsistently formatted.
    • There are several one and two sentence paragraphs that can be combined.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • There are large sections of the article that are unreferenced.
    • There are a few dead links in the article, check the tool.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • The History and Locomotives sections should have a summary of the subarticle.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The article has several major issues that could take more than a week to fix. Therefore, I will have to fail the article. The article may be renominated once these issues are addressed. Dough4872 04:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]