Talk:Indian Railways/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 04:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- The lead should not have citations unless the information is unique. The lead is supposed to be a summary of the whole article.
- The article is poorly formatted, for example the Railway links to adjacent countries section should be prose rather than a bulleted list.
- The tables used in the article are inconsistently formatted.
- There are several one and two sentence paragraphs that can be combined.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- There are large sections of the article that are unreferenced.
- There are a few dead links in the article, check the tool.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The History and Locomotives sections should have a summary of the subarticle.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The article has several major issues that could take more than a week to fix. Therefore, I will have to fail the article. The article may be renominated once these issues are addressed. Dough4872 04:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)